- The Dish’s Weekly Biotechnology News Wrap Up – March 24, 2017Posted 4 days ago
- Laminin cell culture matrices – The key to efficient derivation and reliable culture of stem cells and specialized cells lies within these extracellular matrix proteinsPosted 4 days ago
- Video – Fortem: A platform film built for bioprocessPosted 5 days ago
- The Dish’s Weekly Biotechnology News Wrap Up – March 17, 2017Posted 2 weeks ago
- Cool Tool – The Human Protein AtlasPosted 2 weeks ago
- Optimization of Roche Liberase MNP-S GMP Grade in the Enzymatic Digestion of Human Umbilical Cord for the Isolation of Mesenchymal Stem CellsPosted 2 weeks ago
- Ask the Expert – Maximizing Transient Protein ProductionPosted 2 weeks ago
- The Dish’s Weekly Biotechnology News Wrap Up – March 10, 2017Posted 3 weeks ago
- Enabling Viral Vector Production and Vaccine Manufacturing using the iCELLis – a single-use, automated, and closed manufacturing platformPosted 3 weeks ago
- The Dish’s Weekly Biotechnology News Wrap Up – March 3, 2017Posted 4 weeks ago
Enabling Viral Vector Production and Vaccine Manufacturing using the iCELLis – a single-use, automated, and closed manufacturing platform
In this podcast, we were fortunate to have a group of experts for a panel discussion on vaccine manufacturing and viral vector production.
- Hanna P. Lesch, PhD, Research and Development Director at Finvector Vision Therapies
- Jose Castillo, PhD, Co-Founder and CTO of Univercells
- Mario Philips, Vice President and General Manager, Single-Use Technologies, Pall Life Sciences
- Fabien Moncaubeig, Head of EMEA Bioprocess Services, PALL Life Sciences
We began the podcast with a brief introduction from Fabien Moncaubeig on vaccine and viral vector manufacturing. In this introduction he discussed that the protocols for vaccine and viral vector manufacturing are similar although vaccine manufacturing has a longer history. Both have used adherent cell lines in cell factories or roller bottles. The challenge with these systems is that in order to increase volume you have to scale out rather than scale up. In scaling out you increase the number of pieces of equipment, the overall manufacturing footprint, and the number of employees needed for operation, thus the cost doesn’t decrease significantly.
Another option for manufacturing is suspension culture using microcarriers for the cells to attach to. The advantage here is that you can achieve large volumes, however it does take a good deal of process development time for optimization.
iCELLis provides a fixed-bed scale up solution, but it is different from traditional fixed bed technology in a couple key ways. First it is scalable and has a scale down model with the iCELLis Nano. Second, in traditional fixed bed bioreactors, there is no sampling possible, so analyzing the metabolites is the only way to examine cell health. In the iCELLis, live monitoring of cell density is possible using the Aber Capacitance probe.
We then talked with the inventor of the iCELLis, Jose Castillo about what led him to develop the iCELLis and he spoke about being frustrated with the vaccine manufacturing process and how he was looking to change vaccine scale up. He wanted to focus on process intensification and increased cell density. This is how he began his work on iCELLis. Now as CTO of Univercells, he is focused on ready to use processes for virus manufacturing and the iCELLis is a big part of that work. He spoke of the acquisition of the iCELLis technology by Pall and said it was a great decision. He felt that in order for the iCELLis technology to reach full adoption that it needed the support of a large company who could guarantee the supply chain and provide broad customer support for implementation.
As a follow up, I asked Mario Phillips, Vice President and General Manager, Single-Use Technologies, Pall Life Sciences, how he saw the iCELLis fitting into Pall’s overall product portfolio. He explained that the industry, including Pall, was moving toward a solutions based approach to supply. Instead of just supplying equipment, Pall is focusing on providing solutions via a platform approach with upstream and downstream support for the entire workflow.
We then discussed implementation of the iCELLis technology with Fabien Moncaubeig, Head of Cell Culture Technologies at Pall. This was a particularly interesting discussion, as we talked about making the decision to move into suspension culture vs. staying in adherent. Fabien explained that this decision depends on how key questions are answered. He often guides customers through this decision making process by finding out how much they need to produce, by when, and what is their current process. By discussing these topics, they can then come up with a short term and a long term plan. For example, the short term plan might be to stay in adherent cells using iCELLis for Phase II, because companies need to produce material quickly for clinical study and because they may not want to invest time and resources into process development of a suspension process at this point. Long term, the plan may be to move into suspension culture because companies can achieve a higher capacity and will need to meet a growing demand for their product. Single use, stirred tank bioreactors can reach 2,000 liters, however the iCELLis only reaches 500 square meters, which is roughly the equivalent of 1,000 liter stirred tank. By moving into suspension, companies may find that they can produce more product at lower cost with high volumes, but this is a long term focus.
I then asked about how one could increase production in iCELLis. He explained that in increasing production you have a couple options, the first is to increase the size -either of the bioreactor or the number of bioreactors. The second, and the one Fabien recommends, is to optimize the productivity of the process. This can mean optimizing media or optimizing the cell line through cell line engineering. He said he felt there was a need for cell line engineering of adherent cells, which is an area the industry has excelled at with suspension CHO, but not much time has been spent on adherent cells. He felt this could provide quite an advantage, particularly in gene therapy applications.
I then asked what were some of the biggest application areas for the iCELLis and he said gene therapy applications has had the highest demand and that customers’ requests are usually that they want manufacturing “quick and easy.” They need a high number of viral vectors very quickly and the iCELLis enables this time frame and keeps the costs down. They also have interest from vaccine manufacturers.
As a follow up to the discussion on gene therapy, I asked Hanna Lesch, Research and Development Director at Finvector Vision Therapies about her experiences using the iCELLis for viral vector production. Hanna described how Finvector is working on viral vector based gene therapies and that they were an early adopter of the iCELLis platform. She said they conducted early feasibility studies in the iCELLis Nano and the results were promising. For their feasibility studies, they compared productivity in the iCELLis Nano to shake flask results. With support from Pall, they then worked on process development and scale up, things like cell seeding, media optimization, feeding strategy, etc. She said that the scaling up was pretty straight forward from the Nano to the iCELLis 500 and that they got consistent production, which was really helpful in process validation.
Since the material they are producing is going to be used in clinical trials, I asked about the regulatory response. Hanna said that so far the FDA has been satisfied with the process and has no issues.
We then discussed with Mario recommendations for those who are thinking that they may want to implement iCELLis in their manufacturing process. He recommended spending time in process development with the iCELLis Nano to develop a robust process, which would make the move into the larger scale production more efficient. He also said it was important to really understand the value proposition in terms of the cost savings for capital and operational costs. He said scientists are often convinced about the technology in terms of performance, but also need to also show the other benefits. He said because it is a different approach to growing adherent cells, there is a longer adoption time. With over 100 customers actively in process development with the iCELLis, it seems that they are well on their way toward adoption. Some of the ways in which Pall has sought to reduce the adoption barriers is by providing a great deal of process development data in the iCELLis to customers and to provide process development services. In addition, Mario felt that the iCELLis provides solutions to key industry issues. For instance the iCELLis can reduce manufacturing costs, provide the safety of an automated, closed system and can also reduce time to market by eliminating the process development work of adapting adherent cells to suspension. Mario estimated that by using the iCELLis, one could cut time to market by up to ½.
Thank you to our panel for this podcast, it was a very informative discussion on vaccine and viral vector manufacturing and the iCELLis as an innovative, enabling technology.
Head of EMEA Bioprocess Services, Pall Life Sciences
Fabien Moncaubeig came to Pall Life Sciences through the ATMI acquisition in 2014 and prior to ATMI was one of the first employees of Artelis. In 2015 he was named head of Cell Culture Technologies. In this role he is responsible for the Europe, Middle East and Asia bioprocess service groups. With his team, they work on optimisation and industrialisation of cell culture and downstream processes both within Pall’s lab capabilities and through consulting services at customer site. He has extensive experience with vaccine, viral vector and stem cell productions, as well as managing internal and external bioreactor-centered projects. Moncaubeig holds a masters degree in biotechnology from ENSTBB Bordeaux INP.
Vice President and General Manager, Single-Use Technologies, Pall Life Sciences
Mario Philips joined Pall Corporation in February 2014, also through the acquisition of ATMI LifeSciences. He is vice president and general manager of Single-Use Technologies, and is responsible for developing and executing business strategies that support Pall’s drive to continuously improve bioprocessing both for customers and for the industry as a whole. Philips holds an engineering degree in biochemistry from CTL Gent, and a postgraduate degree in marketing from Groep T Leuven.
Jose Castillo, PhD
Co-Founder and CTO of Univercells
Jose Castillo is the co-founder and CTO of Univercells, a comprehensive biomanufacturing solutions provider. He has more than 15 years of experience in the life sciences industry, including time as the head of Viral Vaccine Industrialization at GSK Vaccines and developing bioreactors for bioproduction at Artelis (of which he was a founder, today part of Pall Corporation). Castillo has a chemical engineering background, with a PhD in Applied Sciences from the Université Libre de Bruxelles and an entrepreneurship degree from the Solvay Business School. He currently also serves as a member of the board for Masthercell and Ovizio.
Hanna P. Lesch, PhD
Research and Development Director at Finvector Vision Therapies
Hanna P. Lesch has served in a dual role as research and development director at FinVector Vision Therapies and sister company FKD Therapies since 2013. With more than 15 years’ experience in the field of gene therapy and vector development, Lesch began her career developing preclinical gene therapy approaches and scalable viral vector processes. She holds a PhD in Molecular Medicine from the University of Kuopio, and completed post doctorate work at the University of California San Diego and University of Eastern Finland. Lesch is also active in the industry, with multiple publications, and patents covering baculovirus mediated lentivirus production.